INPUT
Check the XML before scoring.
Upload one C-CDA file and validate its format before processing.
C-CDA SCORECARD
C-CDA Scorecard. See where documents need attention.
Assess C-CDA structure and terminology. Review document grades, section-level findings and XML references that help your team prioritize corrections.
Browser-based evaluationIG conformanceVocabulary checksSection-level grades
FROM DOCUMENTS TO FINDINGS
Give document review a clear starting point.
A clinical document can arrive successfully and still contain gaps. See which sections and rules need attention before sharing it with another system.
In practiceQuality review
Give reviewers a common starting point.
Use the grade and findings to organize a document review across teams.
Document gradeRule findings
In practiceSection gaps
Focus on the clinical sections that need work.
Review section-level results rather than treating the document as one undifferentiated score.
DemographicsClinical sections
In practiceRemediation
Bring specific findings back to the source.
Share XML references with the team responsible for document generation.
Expected valuesLine references
In practiceAudit history
Review quality across submissions.
Use recorded results to follow the documents your team has assessed.
GradesTimestamps
Features
Move from a grade to the underlying issue.
Keep quality signals connected to the document they describe.
CONFORMANCE
Review two scoring models.
See letter grades for C-CDA implementation-guide conformance and vocabulary conformance.
SECTIONS
Find the gaps by section.
Review demographics, encounters, allergies, medications, problems and immunizations individually.
RULE DETAIL
See what needs to change.
Inspect the failed rule, expected value and XML snippet with its line reference.
ISSUES
Separate structure from terminology.
Review failed-rule counts and issue locations across the document.
HISTORY
Follow quality over time.
Use the audit log to review grades, errors and timestamps from prior submissions.
UPLOAD. SCORE. INVESTIGATE.
Turn a document into a focused review.
Start with a clinical summary, then follow the grades to section and rule details.
Developers & QA
Add quality scoring to your workflow.
Run document assessments and retrieve their findings programmatically.
- Submit C-CDA files for scoring
- Retrieve grading reports and issue summaries
- Query scoring history by user or date
C-CDA Scorecard: sample workflow
BSample grade
IG CONFORMANCE
Follow the grade to the finding.
Select a scoring model or section to inspect illustrative findings.
FOCUSED FINDINGS · IG CONFORMANCE3 illustrative findings
- Document header present
- Section template requires review
- Required entry is missing
Security & trust
A focused environment for evaluation.
Use synthetic or de-identified data only.
Explore the tool with representative test files before planning your production workflow.
Test data only
Keep real patient data out of the trial environment.
HTTPS connections
Data transfers use encrypted connections.
Temporary uploads
The product does not retain uploaded source files.
Production planning
Discuss your deployment and data-handling requirements with the Hgear team.
Who it is for
A shared reference for document quality.
For clinical data operations, document-generation teams and QA reviewers.
Data quality teamsInteroperability engineersClinical informaticistsQA teamsImplementation teamsEnterprise architects
- Review document-generation quality
- Give vendors and partners specific correction details
- Assess source documents before FHIR conversion
Common questions
C-CDA Scorecard FAQ
What does the scorecard evaluate?
It assesses C-CDA XML against implementation-guide and vocabulary rules, with document grades and section-level findings.
How do I locate an issue?
Findings include rule details, expected values and XML references so your team can inspect the source.
Can I compare submissions over time?
The audit history records scoring results, errors and timestamps for previous submissions.
Does the scorecard correct the document?
The scorecard identifies and explains issues. Use those findings to correct the source and submit it again for review.
Make your next document review more focused.
Start with a test file and turn its findings into a correction plan.
Try C-CDA Scorecard
Connect document scoring with broader data-quality checks across your healthcare data workflow.